Logeion

Perseus analysis of βῆσε:

βαίνω (walk, step): aor ind act 3rd sg (homeric ionic)

LSJ entry


Previous Entry Next Entry

βαίνω 

βαίνω (inf. βαίμεναι Hsch.), fut. βήσομαι Il. 2.339, etc., Dor. βᾱσεῦμαι Theoc. 2.8, etc.: pf. βέβηκα Il. 15.90, etc., Dor. βέβᾱκα Pi. I. 4(3).41, etc., with shortd. forms βεβάᾱσι Il. 2.134, contr. βεβᾶσι A. Pers. 1002 (lyr.), Eu. 76, etc.; subj. βεβῶσι (ἐμ-) Pl. Phdr. 252e; inf. βεβάμεν Il. 17.359, βεβάναι E. Heracl. 610 (lyr.); part. βεβαώς, -αυῖα Il. 14.477, Hom. Epigr. 15.10, contr. βεβώς: plpf. ἐβεβήκειν Il. 11.296, etc., Ep. βεβήκειν 6.495; sync. 3pl. βέβᾰσαν 17.286, etc.: aor. 2 ἔβην Il. 17.112, etc., Dor. ἔβᾱν Pi. O. 13.97, etc.; Ep. 3sg. βῆ Il. 13.297, Ep. 3dual βάτην [ᾰ] 1.327, 3pl. ἔβαν A. Pers. 18 (lyr.), (κατ-) S. Tr. 504 (lyr.), Ep. βάν Il. 20.32; imper. βῆθι, Dor. βᾶθι S. Ph. 1196 (lyr.); βᾱ in compds. ἔμβα, κατάβα, etc., 2pl. βᾶτε A. Supp. 191, Eu. 1033 (lyr.); subj. βῶ, Ep. 3sg. βήῃ (ὑπερ-) Il. 9.501, βήω 6.113, ἐμ-βέῃ GDI 5075.4 (Cret.), Dor. βᾶμες (for βῶμεν) Theoc. 15.22; opt. βαίην; inf. βῆναι (Att. Prose only in compds.), Ep. βήμεναι Od. 19.296, Dor. βᾶμεν Pi. P. 4.39; part. βάς βᾶσα βάν, Dor. pl. ἐκ-βῶντας Th. 5.77:— Med., Ep.aor.1 ἐβήσετο (ἀπ-) Il. 1.428:—Pass., pres. (v. infr. A.II.1): in compds., aor. ἀν-, παρ-, ξυν-εβάθην, X. Eq. 3.4, Th. 3.67, 4.30; later παρ-εβάνθην D.C. 48.2,al.; ἀνα-, παρα-, ξυμ-βέβᾰμαι, X. Eq.Mag. 1.4, Th. 1.123, 8.98; παρα-βέβασμαι D. 17.12: fut. παρα-βαθήσομαι Sch.E. Hec. 802.—For the Act. fut. and aor. 1, v. infr. B; for pres. part. βιβάς, v. βίβημι.—In correct Att. Prose the pres. βαίνω is almost the only tense in use; but in compds. Prose writers used all tenses freely.