Logeion

Perseus analysis of ὔμμες:

σύ (thou): nom 2nd pl (epic aeolic)

LSJ entry


Previous Entry Next Entry

σύ 

σύ [ῠ],
A. thou: Pron. of the second pers.:—Ep. nom. τύνη [ῡ] Il. 5.485, al. (Lacon. τούνη Hsch.); Aeol. σύ Sapph. Supp. 16.6, 21.9; Dor. τύ [ῠ] Pi. O. 1.85, Epich. 34, al., Theoc. 3.33, etc.; Boeot. τού [short syll.] Corinn. Supp. 2.83, A.D. Pron. 55.6 (also τούν ib. 50.27, 55.6): Nom. σύ, Od. 18.31, A. Ag. 1035, Ar. Nu. 29, etc.; voc., Od. 21.193, Ar. Ach. 165, Pl. 1069.—Gen. σοῦ, h.Hom. 29.4, elsewh. only Att., Ar. Ach. 302, etc.; enclit. σου, S. Ph. 761, OT 538, etc.; never in Hom., who uses σεῦ, Il. 3.206, al., σέο ib.446, al. (also in Lyr., Archil.(?)inPLit.Lond. 54, B. 3.65), σεῖο Il. 3.137, al.; also σέθεν 1.180, al. (which also occurs in Lyr., Sapph. 33, B. 10.9, and Trag., A. Th. 264, al.), and as enclit. σευ, Il. 5.811, al., σεο 1.396: Hdt. has only σέο 1.124, σεο (enclit.) ib.9, σεῦ ibid., 3.42,85, 7.38, σευ (enclit.) 3.36,134, 7.49:—Dor. τεῦ, τευ, Theoc. 5.19, 10.36, etc.; rarely τέο, Alcm. 17; lengthd. τεοῦ Epich. 145, Sophr. 84, and τεοῖο Il. 8.37, 468; Boeot. τεῦς Corinn. 24; Dor. τεοῦς Sophr. 59; also τιοῦς A.D. Pron. 74.27; τεῦς Theoc. 2.126; τοι v.l. in Id. 7.25; enclit. τεος Sophr. 83; Cret. τέορ Hsch.; other Dor. forms are τίω, τίως, both Rhinth. 13, τίος A.D. Pron. 75.24.—Dat. σοί, Il. 1.158,167, Archil. 88, Mimn. 8, Sapph. 7,99, A. Pr. 3, Hdt. 3.42, 6.86.αʹ, 7.52, etc.; Dor. τοί Alcm. 86 (oxyt.); Dor., Lesb., and Ion. enclit. τοι Alem.33, Sapph. Frr. 2.2,8, Archil. 79, Hippon. 20, Anacr. 44, 75.3, Pi. N. 3.76, B. 10.104, Hdt. 1.115, 3.35,63,85; in Hom., Lesbian Lyr., and Ion. Lyr. and Prose τοι is always enclit., σοί never enclit. (τοί and σοι are not found exc. σοι Od. 3.359, 11.381, σ(οι) Il. 1.170, and in codd. of Pi. P. 4.270, 9.55; rarer than τοι in Hdt., 3.69, al.); in Att. both σοί and σοι (enclit.) are used (σοί Ar. Nu. 361, etc., σοι ib.87, etc.), τοί and τοι are not used; σοι is never elided exc. in Il. 1.170, τοι is elided in Od. 1.60,347, Alc. 55, Id. Oxy. 1788 Fr. 15 ii 9, Sapph. 28.2; Ep. and Lyr. also τεΐν, Il. 11.201, Od. 4.619, Epigr. ap. Hdt. 5.60,61, Ar. Av. 930; also τίν [ῐ], Alcm. 16, Pi. P. 1.29, 8.68 (dub. l.); τίν [ῑ], Id. I. 6(5).4, Theoc. 2.20 (τίν before a consonant, Pi. O. 10(11).93); also τεΐ Alcm. 53; τίνη Rhinth. 13.—Acc. σέ, Il. 6.256, al.; enclit. σε, 1.26, Sapph. 1.2, Supp. 23.9, Hdt. 3.42, etc.; in late Gr. σέν, Anatolian Studies p.76; Dor. τέ Alcm. 52, Pi. O. 1.48, Theoc. 1.5, Call. Fr. 114; τʼ v.l. (cod. R) in Ar. Ach. 779 (on the accent v. A.D. Pron. 54.14, 83.4); τρέ (leg. τϝέ) Hsch.; or (enclit.) τυ IG 42(1).121.69 (Epid., iv B.C.), Ar. Eq. 1225, Ach. 730 (dub. in Ach. 779), Theoc. 1.56,78, etc.:—also τίν Corinn. 4, Cerc. 7.6, Theoc. 11.39,55,68.
III. Plur. nom. ὑμεῖς, Il. 2.75, al. (before a vowel, 4.246, 7.194, al.), Pherecyd.Syr. 11, Democr. 29a, Hdt. 3.72, etc., ye, you; Aeol. and Ep. ὔμμες Il. 1.274, al., Sapph. 24, 25; Dor. ὑμές Sophr. 60, Ar. Ach. 760,761,862; ὑμέν SIG 685.118 (Crete, ii B.C.), GDI 5155.6 (ibid., ii B.C.); Boeot. οὐμές Corinn. 6; a resolved form ὑμέες, Parth. Fr. 14, is a poeticlicence (so A.D. Pron. 93.3) rather than genuine Ionic (v.l. in Hdt. 8.22).— Gen. ὑμῶν, Ar. Ach. 143, etc.; ὑμέων (disyll.) Il. 7.159, Od. 13.7, al., Archil. 74.6 (ὑμῶν codd.), Sol. 11.5 (v.l. ὑμῶν) ; ὑμέων also Hdt. 3.73, 6.130, al.; as trisyll., Herod. 2.27; ὑμείων Il. 4.348, 7.195, al.; Dor. ὑμέων Sophr. 46; also ὑμῶν, A.D. Pron. 95.23; Aeol. ὑμμέων Alc. 96; Boeot. οὐμίων Corinn. 22.—Dat. ὑμῖν, Od. 2.46, Hdt. 1.126, etc.; Ion. enclit. ὗμῐν A.D. Pron. 97.28, also Dor., Sophr. 91; Dor. (not enclit.) ὑμίν [ῐ] Id. 92; ὑμίν [ῐ] also in S. Aj. 864, 1242, OT 991, 1402, Ant. 308, El. 804, al. (but ὗμιν shd. perh. be restd. where the sense needs an enclitic on the principle stated by A.D. Pron. 35.6, 36.5, Synt. 130.23); ὕμιν (as enclit.) is prescribed by Hdn.Gr. (2.124) in Il. 24.33, by EM 432.34 in Od. 1.376, 2.141, etc.:—Aeol. and Ep. ὔμμῐ, ὔμμῐν, Od. 2.316, 11.336, al., Hes. Sc. 328, Sapph. 14, Alc. Supp. 26.9, Pi. O. 11(10).17.—Acc. ὑμᾶς, Ar. Ach. 325, etc. ( Orph. A. 820, v.l. in S. Ph. 222; ὗμας or (more prob.) ὕμας is required by the metre in Babr. 9.9, 47.11); Ion. ὑμέας (disyll.) Od. 21.198, al.; enclit. ὕμεας (disyll.) Herod. 2.60 (Pap.); ὑμέας also Hdt. 1.126, al.; Aeol. and Ep. ὔμμε Il. 23.412, al., Pi. I. 6(5).19; also in A. Eu. 620 (trim.), and S. Ant. 846(lyr.); Dor. ὑμέ Alcm. 3, Sophr. 52, Ar. Ach. 737, Lys. 1076, SIG 528.3 (Cretan dial., iii B.C.), 622 B 8 (Cretan, ii B.C.).—The pl. is sts. used in addressing one person, when others are included in the speakerʼs thought, as Od. 12.81, Archil. 89. (With σύ cf. Lat. tu, Goth. pu; with τοι Skt. gen. and dat. te; the origin of σφῶϊ is doubtful; with ὑμεῖς cf. Skt. acc. pl. yusmān.)